Within neighborhood
80
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally
Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chickasaw
Tract 01097007500 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,261 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 01097007500 covers part of the Alabama Village area of Prichard, AL, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,261 residents. The severe-burden share is 76%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units495
Renter share23.0%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate24.1%
Median income$28,656
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
99
th percentile
Very High
Within state
99
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region
Centroid at 30.7432, -88.0818 · click any tract to drill in
Why Alabama Village scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
24.1% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$914 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.9
How Alabama Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 21%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 91Total filings over 10 yrs
- 3.20%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.3%Peak (2006)
- 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.1%Housing insecurity
- 22.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 42.9%Food insecurity
- 39.5%SNAP enrollment
- 20.3%Transit barriers
- 13.4%No health insurance
- 18.5%Frequent mental distress
- 46.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village
Cost burden runs 86% here against 43.6% across Mobile County. SNAP participation runs 39.5% against 15.2% nationally.
The score leans hardest on housing-court posture at 8.9/10. Set annual rent against average income of $28,656 and the ratio lands at 38%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. Against the Mobile County average of 4.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10. Housing insecurity runs 29.1% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 91 filings here across 10 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2006 at 5.3% of renter households.
In a typical year about 3.2% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 01097007500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097007500?
Census tract 01097007500 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01097007500?
Median gross rent is $914/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097007500?
24.1% of residents in tract 01097007500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,261.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097007500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 11th, minority 96th, housing 21th.
Q5
Is tract 01097007500 considered part of Alabama Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097007500 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097007500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 91 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097007500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.20% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01097007500 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01097007500 compare to Chickasaw overall?
Tract 01097007500 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw
Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
Neely
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Alabama Village
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01097004900
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Alabama Village
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Toulminville
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Neely
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01097006103
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01097006106
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Related