Within neighborhood
40
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally
Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw
Tract 01097005000 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,515 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Tract 01097005000, home to 1,515 residents in the Alabama Village area of Chickasaw, scores $1/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 76th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 35% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $954 a month while the average household earns $39,274 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units498
Renter share34.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate32.8%
Median income$39,274
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
82
th percentile
High
Within state
83
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region
Centroid at 30.7606, -88.1010 · click any tract to drill in
Why Alabama Village scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
32.8% poverty · this tract
8.2
Supply constraint
$954 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6
How Alabama Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 71Total filings over 10 yrs
- 3.88%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.0%Peak (2002)
- 7Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.7%Housing insecurity
- 23.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 44.0%Food insecurity
- 41.5%SNAP enrollment
- 21.8%Transit barriers
- 15.2%No health insurance
- 21.4%Frequent mental distress
- 48.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chickasaw, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Mobile County average of 4.9 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 29.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 23.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 01097005000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097005000?
Census tract 01097005000 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01097005000?
Median gross rent is $954/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097005000?
32.8% of residents in tract 01097005000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,515.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097005000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 87th, minority 86th, housing 2th.
Q5
Is tract 01097005000 considered part of Alabama Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097005000 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097005000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 71 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097005000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.88% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01097005000 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01097005000 compare to Chickasaw overall?
Tract 01097005000 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw
Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related