Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally

Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw

Tract 01097005000 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,515 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 01097005000 covers part of the Alabama Village area of Chickasaw, AL, and scores 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,515 residents. SNAP participation runs 41.5% against 15.2% nationally.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 23% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units498
Renter share34.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate32.8%
Median income$39,274

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Alabama Village
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Chickasaw
Very High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#10 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region

Centroid at 30.7606, -88.1010 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alabama Village scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
32.8% poverty · this tract
8.2
Supply constraint
$954 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6

How Alabama Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alabama Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.7This tracttract 0050004.3Chickasawparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 71Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 3.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2002)
  • 7Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01097005000
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10. The poverty rate is 33%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.6/10. Housing insecurity runs 29.7% against 14.2% nationally.

It sits 1.7 points above the Mobile County average of 4.0. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 43.6% across Mobile County. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10.

Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The filing record is not thin: 71 evictions over 10 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2002 at 5.0% of renter households. In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 74% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 7.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the AL average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097005000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097005000?

Census tract 01097005000 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097005000?

Median gross rent is $954/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097005000?

32.8% of residents in tract 01097005000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,515.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097005000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 87th, minority 86th, housing 2th.
Q5

Is tract 01097005000 considered part of Alabama Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097005000 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097005000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 71 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097005000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.88% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097005000 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097005000 compare to Chickasaw overall?

Tract 01097005000 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw

Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related