Hannon Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Mobile
Tract 01097000902 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,808 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 01097000902 covers part of the Hannon Park area of Mobile, AL, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,808. Severe burden reaches 54%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Mobile and the region
Centroid at 30.6834, -88.0744 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hannon Park scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Hannon Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 52%Household composition
- 41%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 3%Grade A
- 18%Grade B
- 69%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 140Total filings over 10 yrs
- 3.79%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.2%Peak (2001)
- 13Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hannon Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.0%Housing insecurity
- 6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.9%Food insecurity
- 8.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.7%Transit barriers
- 6.7%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 29.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Hannon Park
Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Cost burden runs 57% here against 43.6% across Mobile County. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
At $857 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Mobile commands. It sits 1.0 points below the Mobile County average of 4.0.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.8/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 140 filings here across 10 tracked years. SNAP participation runs 8.1% against 15.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2001, when 5.2% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Mobile. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.8% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 5.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 01097000902
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097000902?
What is the average rent in tract 01097000902?
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097000902?
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097000902?
Is tract 01097000902 considered part of Hannon Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097000902?
What share of households in tract 01097000902 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 01097000902 compare to Mobile overall?
Was tract 01097000902 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Mobile
Top eight tracts in Mobile ranked by composite eviction-risk score.