Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw
Tract 01097004800 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,057 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Here is how census tract 01097004800, in Alabama Village in Chickasaw, looks to a landlord: a 6.6/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 1,057. It lands near the 90th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 54% of renter households, a severe level, and 47% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $336 monthly, set against $9,153 in average yearly household income, roughly 44% of income at the averages. About 80% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region
Centroid at 30.7509, -88.0882 · click any tract to drill in
Why Alabama Village scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Alabama Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 85
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 98%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 56%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 285Total filings over 10 yrs
- 7.14%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.4%Peak (2001)
- 23Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 46.0%Housing insecurity
- 41.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 69.0%Food insecurity
- 72.8%SNAP enrollment
- 36.8%Transit barriers
- 22.2%No health insurance
- 25.0%Frequent mental distress
- 60.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village
The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chickasaw, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Mobile County average of 4.9 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 285 eviction filings here over 10 tracked years, with about 7.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.4% of renter households in 2001.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 85th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 01097004800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097004800?
What is the average rent in tract 01097004800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097004800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097004800?
Is tract 01097004800 considered part of Alabama Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097004800?
What share of households in tract 01097004800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 01097004800 compare to Chickasaw overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw
Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.