Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chickasaw

Tract 01097007600 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,807 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 01097007600 covers part of the Alabama Village area of Prichard, AL, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 21% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units619
Renter share43.1%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate44.1%
Median income$29,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Alabama Village
Elevated
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Chickasaw
Moderate
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region

Centroid at 30.7405, -88.0727 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alabama Village scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
44.1% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,006 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.9

How Alabama Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alabama Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 007600Chickasaw: 4.34.3Chickasawparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 110Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 2.93%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2007)
  • 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010970076002001: 16 filings (4.57/100 renter HHs)2002: 12 filings (3.43/100 renter HHs)2006: 18 filings (4.31/100 renter HHs)2007: 19 filings (4.55/100 renter HHs)2008: 11 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2009: 5 filings (1.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (2.99/100 renter HHs)2014: 6 filings (1.49/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (1.24/100 renter HHs)2016: 6 filings (2.87/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 63% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village

The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The poverty rate is 44%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Set annual rent against average income of $29,625 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8.9/10. Disability prevalence runs 49.8% against 31.5% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 27.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

It sits 2.0 points above the Mobile County average of 4.0. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. Cost burden runs 50% here against 43.6% across Mobile County.

Court records carry 110 eviction filings across 10 observed years. At $1,006 a month, rents run 9% over what the rest of Prichard commands. The worst year on record was 2007, when 4.6% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097007600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097007600?

Census tract 01097007600 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097007600?

Median gross rent is $1,006/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097007600?

44.1% of residents in tract 01097007600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,807.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097007600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 42th, minority 96th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 01097007600 considered part of Alabama Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097007600 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097007600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 110 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097007600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.93% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097007600 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 27.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097007600 compare to Chickasaw overall?

Tract 01097007600 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw

Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related