Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Young Forte Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Montgomery
Tract 01101002300 · Montgomery County, AL · pop 2,536 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Tract 01101002300 sits in the Young Forte Village area of Montgomery eviction risk, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. It is home to 2,536 residents. The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,077
Renter share51.1%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate31.4%
Median income$34,325
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
68
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
90
th percentile
Very High
Within state
84
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Montgomery and the region
Centroid at 32.3341, -86.3219 · click any tract to drill in
Why Young Forte Village scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Montgomery
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
31.4% poverty · this tract
7.9
Supply constraint
$1,056 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Montgomery
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Montgomery
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Montgomery
3.0
How Young Forte Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 100%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 2%Grade B
- 21%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 265Total filings over 9 yrs
- 6.78%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.3%Peak (2008)
- 30Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Young Forte Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 28.7%Housing insecurity
- 22.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 41.1%Food insecurity
- 37.4%SNAP enrollment
- 19.8%Transit barriers
- 14.2%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 49.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Young Forte Village
Food insecurity runs 41.1% against 17.8% nationally. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $34,325 and the ratio lands at 37%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10. The poverty rate is 31%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 22.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. It sits 1.0 points above the Montgomery County average of 4.0.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 265 filings here across 9 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2008 at 7.3% of renter households.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Montgomery. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 6.8% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 01101002300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01101002300?
Census tract 01101002300 in the Young Forte Village neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01101002300?
Median gross rent is $1,056/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01101002300?
31.4% of residents in tract 01101002300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,536.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01101002300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 60th, minority 100th, housing 60th.
Q5
Is tract 01101002300 considered part of Young Forte Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01101002300 fall within Young Forte Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01101002300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 265 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 01101002300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.78% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01101002300 struggle to pay rent?
About 28.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01101002300 compare to Montgomery overall?
Tract 01101002300 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Montgomery at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Montgomery eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01101002300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Montgomery
Top eight tracts in Montgomery ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
01101006100
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Cloverdale Historic District
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Maxwell Heights
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01101001600
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Garden District
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01101000300
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01101005606
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01101000400
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related