Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Young Forte Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Montgomery

Tract 01101002400 · Montgomery County, AL · pop 1,453 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 01101002400 covers part of the Young Forte Village area of Montgomery, AL, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,453 residents. Cost burden runs 62% here against 42.8% across Montgomery County.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 11% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units644
Renter share29.5%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate46.8%
Median income$21,607

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Young Forte Village
Very Low
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#18 of 63 tracts In Montgomery
Elevated
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 71 tracts In Montgomery County
High
Within state
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#226 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Montgomery and the region

Centroid at 32.3413, -86.3351 · click any tract to drill in

Why Young Forte Village scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Montgomery
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
46.8% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$861 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Montgomery
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Montgomery
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Montgomery
3.0

How Young Forte Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Young Forte Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.05.0This tracttract 002400Montgomery: 3.63.6Montgomeryparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 231Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 7.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.3%Peak (2008)
  • 24Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 011010024002001: 28 filings (7.06/100 renter HHs)2002: 31 filings (7.82/100 renter HHs)2006: 28 filings (9.31/100 renter HHs)2007: 22 filings (7.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 34 filings (11.31/100 renter HHs)2009: 19 filings (6.32/100 renter HHs)2013: 20 filings (5.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 25 filings (7.20/100 renter HHs)2016: 24 filings (9.52/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Young Forte Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Young Forte Village

What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10. The severe-burden share is 35%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Disability prevalence runs 56.6% against 31.5% nationally. The poverty rate is 47%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Set annual rent against average income of $21,607 and the ratio lands at 48%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 32.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10. At $861 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Montgomery commands.

It sits 1.0 points above the Montgomery County average of 4.0. Court records carry 231 eviction filings across 9 observed years. Filings peaked in 2008 at 11.3% of renter households.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Montgomery. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 8.0% of renter households face a filing.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01101002400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01101002400?

Census tract 01101002400 in the Young Forte Village neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01101002400?

Median gross rent is $861/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01101002400?

46.8% of residents in tract 01101002400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,453.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01101002400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 75th, minority 99th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 01101002400 considered part of Young Forte Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01101002400 fall within Young Forte Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01101002400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 231 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 01101002400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.96% of renter households, peaking at 11.3% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01101002400 struggle to pay rent?

About 37.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 32.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01101002400 compare to Montgomery overall?

Tract 01101002400 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Montgomery at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Montgomery eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 01101002400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Montgomery

Top eight tracts in Montgomery ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related