Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,308 of 84,120 nationally

Kid Alley Residential Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Phenix City

Tract 01113030700 · Russell County, AL · pop 3,817 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 01113030700 sits in the Kid Alley Residential Historic District area of Phenix City eviction risk, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. It is home to 3,817 residents. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 42% Owners 30%
Tract context
Occupied units1,478
Renter share70.9%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate31.4%
Median income$43,797

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Kid Alley Residential Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 14 tracts In Phenix City
High
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 18 tracts In Russell County
High
Within state
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#414 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Phenix City and the region

Centroid at 32.4620, -85.0137 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kid Alley Residential Historic District scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Phenix City
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
31.4% poverty · this tract
7.8
Supply constraint
$915 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Phenix City
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Phenix City
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Phenix City
2.2

How Kid Alley Residential Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kid Alley Residential Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.6This tracttract 0307003.4Phenix Cityparent city3.7Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 679Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 8.63%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.3%Peak (2003)
  • 44Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01113030700
Filings dropped 43% over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kid Alley Residential Historic District

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.2/10. The poverty rate is 31%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. 71% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

SNAP participation runs 30.4% against 15.2% nationally. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Housing insecurity runs 26.2% against 14.2% nationally. Court records carry 679 eviction filings across 9 observed years.

Against the Russell County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points. The worst year on record was 2003, when 15.3% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 8.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 53rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.3/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 01113030700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01113030700?

Census tract 01113030700 in the Kid Alley Residential Historic District neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01113030700?

Median gross rent is $915/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01113030700?

31.4% of residents in tract 01113030700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,817.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01113030700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 86th, minority 84th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 01113030700 considered part of Kid Alley Residential Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01113030700 fall within Kid Alley Residential Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01113030700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 679 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 01113030700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.63% of renter households, peaking at 15.3% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01113030700 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01113030700 compare to Phenix City overall?

Tract 01113030700 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Phenix City at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Phenix City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Phenix City

Top eight tracts in Phenix City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related