Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Alabaster Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 01117030612 · Shelby County, AL · pop 2,704 · 45% of tract blocks fall in Alabaster

01117030612 is a census tract in Alabaster, AL. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,704. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 6% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units926
Renter share11.6%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$110,781

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 10 tracts In Alabaster
Very Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 55 tracts In Shelby County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#968 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Alabaster and the region

Centroid at 33.1895, -86.7961 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alabaster scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Alabaster
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Alabaster
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Alabaster
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Alabaster
5.1

How Alabaster compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alabaster risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0306123.4Alabasterparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alabaster

Cost burden runs 50% here against 40.0% across Shelby County. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Shelby County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.

Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the AL average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01117030612

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01117030612?

Census tract 01117030612 in Alabaster scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 01117030612?

2.6% of residents in tract 01117030612 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,704.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 01117030612?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 62th, minority 30th, housing 3th.
Q4

What share of households in tract 01117030612 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5

How does tract 01117030612 compare to Alabaster overall?

Tract 01117030612 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Alabaster at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Alabaster eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Alabaster

Top eight tracts in Alabaster ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related