University Lane Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tuscaloosa

SNAP participation runs 53.1% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. This is renter territory: 98% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

The poverty rate is 43%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Disability prevalence runs 53.3% against 31.5% nationally.

Cost burden runs 57% here against 43.3% across Tuscaloosa County. At $665 a month, rents run 37% under what the rest of Tuscaloosa commands. Annualized rent equals 41% of average household income of $19,554, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.

It sits 1.1 points above the Tuscaloosa County average of 4.1. That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.