Skip to content
McIntosh, Alabama eviction risk overview
City brief · 364 residents

McIntosh, AL Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Washington County · Population 364

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

46th percentile, Alabama.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.6 Now2.1
3.5 2.0 1976 · score 3.3 1977 · score 3.4 1978 · score 3.4 1979 · score 3.4 1980 · score 3.5 1981 · score 3.5 1982 · score 3.4 1983 · score 3.3 1984 · score 3.2 1985 · score 3.1 1986 · score 3.0 1987 · score 2.9 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.8 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.4 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.4 1998 · score 2.4 1999 · score 2.4 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.4 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.3 2009 · score 2.5 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.4 2013 · score 2.4 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.0 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 2.8 2021 · score 2.9 2022 · score 2.1 2023 · score 2.1 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.2 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.3 Regional 3.3 State 1.8 Economic 4.9 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.4 Tenant 1.0 Housing 1.5 2.1 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +55.4% (2024)
    3.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.3
  3. State political climate
    Alabama legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    5.1% poverty · 5.0% unemp.
    4.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $450 average · 15.1% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    12.9% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    29 days filing → judgment
    1.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    15.1% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across McIntosh and the region

Click any city to see its score

How McIntosh compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Washington County
Elevated
#5 of 15 cities
Rank in county, 71st percentileLowHigh
#5 of 15 cities in Washington County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Alabama
Moderate
#356 of 593 cities
Rank in state, 40th percentileLowHigh
#356 of 593 cities in Alabama for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
McIntosh risk score vs. county / state / U.S.McIntosh: 2.12.1McIntoshThis cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg in countyState: 2.42.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.1
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-1.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 29d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $450/mo. A contested eviction takes 29 days and costs $935–$2,452 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 15.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 364 residents, 15.1% rent. 13% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.3 and 3.3 (GOP margin +55.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.4, housing court bias 1.5, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.9. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 5.1% poverty, 5.0% unemployment, 13% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

McIntosh sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Mobile, AL · 30d · ~$1.9k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.8 Mobile Huntsville, AL · 29d · ~$2.0k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Huntsville Birmingham, AL · 32d · ~$1.7k all-in ($52/day) · score 2.9 Birmingham Montgomery, AL · 28d · ~$2.0k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.8 Montgomery Tuscaloosa, AL · 28d · ~$1.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.8 Tuscaloosa Hoover, AL · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.2 Hoover Auburn, AL · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.5 Auburn Dothan, AL · 31d · ~$1.9k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.5 Dothan Madison, AL · 30d · ~$2.1k all-in ($69/day) · score 2 Madison Decatur, AL · 31d · ~$1.8k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.5 Decatur Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle McIntosh
McIntosh · 29d · ~$1.7k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in McIntosh, AL

Landlording in McIntosh, Alabama, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.1/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

McIntosh is a city of 364 residents where 15.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 12.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $450/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How McIntosh eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in McIntosh closes 29 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of McIntosh's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in McIntosh runs $935 to $2,452 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 29 days of typical timeline and $450/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in McIntosh, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Alabama, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in McIntosh: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Alabama's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,452 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in McIntosh

Trap · ALA. CODE 35-9A AURLTA
The 1.7/10 score weighs nine sub-factors. The most relevant for landlords are court bias, eviction process difficulty, and supply constraint. See the sub-score breakdown above. State-level framework: Ala. Code 35-9A AURLTA.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in McIntosh for no reason?

Alabama law does not require a "just cause" for eviction for month-to-month tenancies, provided you give proper notice. For a month-to-month lease, you can terminate the tenancy with a 30-day notice. For a fixed-term lease, you generally need a lease violation or expiration of the term, unless the lease specifies otherwise.

Q2

How much notice do I need to give for a rent increase in McIntosh?

Alabama law doesn't specify a notice period for rent increases for month-to-month leases. However, it's best practice to give at least 30 days' written notice, aligning with the 30-day notice for tenancy termination. For a fixed-term lease, you can only increase rent at the end of the lease term unless the lease allows for it sooner.

Q3

What if my tenant abandons the property?

If you reasonably believe a tenant has abandoned the property (e.g., removed all belongings, stopped paying rent, no response to communication), you can take possession. However, you must be careful. If the tenant claims they didn't abandon it, you could face legal trouble. It's often safer to proceed with a formal eviction or get a clear, written agreement from the tenant that they are vacating. Consult an attorney if there's any doubt.

Q4

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant doesn't pay rent?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction tactic in Alabama and can result in severe penalties, including paying the tenant damages. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Cutting off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings are all illegal actions.

Q5

Does Alabama have any tenant protections I should know about?

While Alabama is generally landlord-friendly, tenants do have rights under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. This includes the right to a safe and habitable living environment, proper notice for eviction, and the right to have their security deposit returned within 60 days. There are no statewide rent control or source-of-income protections. For a full overview, see our Alabama tenant protections guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.1/10 places McIntosh in the 46th percentile of Alabama cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.