Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Badger Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 02090001402 · Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK · pop 4,493 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Badger

Tract 02090001402 sits in Badger eviction risk, AK, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.3/10. Population here is 4,493. Against Fairbanks North Star Borough at 38.7%, 18% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 18% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,618
Renter share22.5%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$79,597

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Badger
Very High
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#13 of 22 tracts In Fairbanks North Star Borough
Moderate
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#117 of 177 tracts In Alaska
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Badger and the region

Centroid at 64.7901, -147.4607 · click any tract to drill in

Why Badger scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Badger
1.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Alaska legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,905 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Badger
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Badger
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Badger
3.3

How Badger compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Badger risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0014023.4Badgerparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Badger

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the softer side, local political climate reads 1.8/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10.

Average gross rent is $1,905, 17% above the Badger average. The voucher gap is 14.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.4/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

It tracks the Fairbanks North Star Borough average of 3.8 closely. Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $79,597.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 02090001402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 02090001402?

Census tract 02090001402 in Badger scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 02090001402?

Median gross rent is $1,905/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 02090001402?

3.0% of residents in tract 02090001402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,493.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 02090001402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 4th, minority 34th, housing 57th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 02090001402 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 02090001402 compare to Badger overall?

Tract 02090001402 scores 3.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Badger at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Badger eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Badger

Top eight tracts in Badger ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related