Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Badger Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 02090001501 · Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK · pop 4,299 · 62% of tract blocks fall in Badger

Tract 02090001501 sits in Badger eviction risk, AK, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 4,299. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 9% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,501
Renter share16.7%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$114,839

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Badger
Very Low
Within county
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 22 tracts In Fairbanks North Star Borough
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#135 of 177 tracts In Alaska
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Badger and the region

Centroid at 64.7785, -147.2313 · click any tract to drill in

Why Badger scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Badger
1.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Alaska legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,568 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Badger
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Badger
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Badger
3.3

How Badger compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Badger risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0015013.4Badgerparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 40

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Badger

49% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Fairbanks North Star Borough average of 38.7%. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

On the softer side, local political climate reads 1.8/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10. SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 9.7% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 0.8 points below the Fairbanks North Star Borough average of 3.8.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $114,839, annual rent is just 16%. Statewide the AK average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 02090001501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 02090001501?

Census tract 02090001501 in Badger scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 02090001501?

Median gross rent is $1,568/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 02090001501?

3.9% of residents in tract 02090001501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,299.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 02090001501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 19th, minority 46th, housing 65th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 02090001501 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 02090001501 compare to Badger overall?

Tract 02090001501 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Badger at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Badger eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Badger

Top eight tracts in Badger ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related