Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally
Stockham Eviction Risk: Moderate , Flowing Wells
Tract 04019004513 ·
Pima, AZ · pop 3,404 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 04019004513 sits in the Stockham area of Flowing Wells eviction risk, Arizona eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 6.5/10. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $954 a month against an average household income of $36,550 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 26% of occupied homes.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%Stable renters 12%Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,505
Renter share25.8%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate34.3%
Median income$36,550
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Stockham
Moderate
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 3 tracts In Flowing Wells
Very High
Within county
89th percentile
#31 of 270 tracts In Pima
High
Within state
92th percentile
#145 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Flowing Wells and the region
Centroid at 32.2837, -111.0028 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stockham scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Flowing Wells
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
34.3% poverty · this tract
8.6
Supply constraint
$954 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Flowing Wells
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Flowing Wells
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Flowing Wells
7.2
How Stockham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
93%Socioeconomic
96%Household composition
72%Racial/ethnic minority
79%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
549Total filings over 12 yrs
14.39%Avg annual filing rate
16.3%Peak (2011)
38Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2017
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
19.1%Housing insecurity
14.5%Utility-shutoff threat
28.1%Food insecurity
25.9%SNAP enrollment
15.3%Transit barriers
19.2%No health insurance
20.3%Frequent mental distress
44.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Stockham
The heaviest input here is economic stress at 8.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Flowing Wells eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pima County average of 5.5 and above the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 549 eviction filings here over 12 tracked years, with about 14.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 16.3% of renter households in 2011.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 04019004513
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004513?
Census tract 04019004513 in the Stockham neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04019004513?
Median gross rent is $954/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004513?
34.3% of residents in tract 04019004513 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,404.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004513?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 96th, minority 72th, housing 79th.
Q5
Is tract 04019004513 considered part of Stockham?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004513 fall within Stockham (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004513?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 549 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004513 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.39% of renter households, peaking at 16.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 04019004513 struggle to pay rent?
About 19.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 04019004513 compare to Flowing Wells overall?
Tract 04019004513 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Flowing Wells at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Flowing Wells eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Flowing Wells
Top eight tracts in Flowing Wells ranked by composite eviction-risk score.