Pima County, Arizona Eviction Risk: Low
49 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Tucson (3.2) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #4 of 15 AZ counties
1.0M residents · 49 cities · 270 tracts
Pima County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord22.1%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Pima County, AZ, tenants prevail in roughly 22.1% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline42dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Pima County, AZ until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 42 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.9–4.6klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Pima County, AZ costs landlords $1,933 to $4,615 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$1,32431% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Pima County, AZ is $1,324 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 31% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters35.1%of households35.1% of occupied housing units in Pima County, AZ are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty14.3%5.6% unemp.14.3% of Pima County, AZ residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 5.6%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Pima County averages 2.9/10 across 49 cities, with scores ranging from 2.9 in the lowest-risk city to 5.4 in the highest-risk cities, including Flowing Wells. Ranked 1st of 15 Arizona counties by eviction risk, the highest in the state.
How Pima County ranks in Arizona
Landlord guides for Arizona
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Tucson | 547,073 | 3.2 | 32.8% | $1,145 | Dem |
| 002 | Casas Adobes | 72,059 | 2.6 | 30.8% | $1,650 | Dem |
| 003 | Marana | 56,938 | 2.4 | 24.6% | $1,818 | Dem |
| 004 | Catalina Foothills | 52,593 | 2.3 | 26.9% | $1,412 | Dem |
| 005 | Oro Valley | 48,162 | 2.4 | 28.3% | $1,669 | Dem |
| 006 | Sahuarita | 35,862 | 2.7 | 27.1% | $1,837 | Dem |
| 007 | Drexel Heights | 27,675 | 2.7 | 32.1% | $1,342 | Dem |
| 008 | Green Valley | 22,114 | 2.5 | 45.2% | $1,171 | Dem |
| 009 | Flowing Wells | 16,559 | 3.1 | 31.2% | $1,034 | Dem |
| 010 | Vail | 16,315 | 2.3 | 22.4% | $2,057 | Dem |
| 011 | Tanque Verde | 15,866 | 2.6 | 31.9% | $1,347 | Dem |
| 012 | Valencia West | 14,728 | 2.4 | 14.0% | $1,850 | Dem |
| 013 | Tucson Estates | 12,136 | 2.4 | 28.7% | $1,248 | Dem |
| 014 | Tucson Mountains | 11,353 | 2.5 | 51.0% | $1,450 | Dem |
| 015 | Corona de Tucson | 9,566 | 2.4 | 18.8% | $2,213 | Dem |
| 016 | Picture Rocks | 9,448 | 2.9 | 51.0% | $960 | Dem |
| 017 | Rincon Valley | 6,512 | 2.3 | 36.8% | $1,896 | Dem |
| 018 | Catalina | 6,489 | 2.3 | 22.8% | $1,326 | Dem |
| 019 | Avra Valley | 6,277 | 3.0 | 22.7% | $661 | Dem |
| 020 | Three Points | 5,254 | 2.4 | 17.2% | $993 | Dem |
| 021 | Summit | 4,896 | 3.2 | 30.8% | $655 | Dem |
| 022 | South Tucson | 4,550 | 3.1 | 33.4% | $941 | Dem |
| 023 | Ajo | 3,107 | 2.7 | 27.3% | $838 | Dem |
| 024 | Sells | 1,935 | 2.8 | 11.3% | $383 | Dem |
| 025 | Santa Rosa | 615 | 2.8 | 9.0% | $808 | Dem |
| 026 | Pisinemo | 311 | 2.9 | 7.1% | $702 | Dem |
| 027 | Arivaca | 268 | 2.4 | 20.9% | $498 | Dem |
| 028 | San Miguel | 237 | 3.0 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 029 | Gu Oidak | 192 | 3.1 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 030 | South Komelik | 178 | 2.4 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 031 | Ali Molina | 171 | 2.1 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 032 | Topawa | 166 | 2.3 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 033 | Chiawuli Tak | 146 | 2.4 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 034 | Wahak Hotrontk | 125 | 2.3 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 035 | Haivana Nakya | 96 | 2.3 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 036 | Anegam | 92 | 2.4 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 037 | Ventana | 92 | 2.3 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 038 | Ali Chukson | 77 | 2.1 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 039 | Ko Vaya | 53 | 2.3 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 040 | Why | 52 | 2.4 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 041 | Comobabi | 44 | 2.5 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 042 | Maish Vaya | 38 | 2.4 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 043 | Kohatk | 37 | 2.5 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 044 | Cowlic | 25 | 2.5 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 045 | Ak Chin | 22 | 2.0 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 046 | Tat Momoli | 18 | 2.6 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 047 | Ali Chuk | 18 | 2.3 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 048 | Nolic | 12 | 2.5 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
| 049 | Charco | 7 | 2.9 | 32.3% | $1,044 | Dem |
County heatmap
Neighborhoods in Pima County
Top 26 neighborhoods by population. Click for a pop-weighted risk score and the constituent census tracts.
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Pima County carries an average eviction-risk score of 2.9/10, placing it in the Moderate tier, yet that average obscures real variation across the county's 49 cities and census-designated places. More telling is the county's rank: it sits at 1 of 15 Arizona counties, meaning no other county in Arizona scores higher on risk. Landlords operating here face a market where renter share runs at 35.1% of households and average rent sits at $1,324 per month, with rent burden averaging 31.2% of renter income, a combination that historically correlates with elevated lease-compliance stress and collections difficulty.
For investors sizing up Pima County against alternatives in Arizona, the picture is nuanced. The county's 1.0 million residents create genuine demand, and many suburban nodes are meaningfully safer than the county average suggests. However, the intra-county spread from 2 to 3.2 out of 10 means neighborhood selection is as important here as it is almost anywhere in the state, and due diligence on individual zip codes is not optional.
The cities inside Pima County
The highest-risk locations in the county are Flowing Wells, South Tucson, Chiawuli Tak, and Haivana Nakya, each scoring 2.3/10, the ceiling of what any city here reaches. Tucson proper, with a population of 547,073, scores 5.3/10, as do Casas Adobes (population 72,059) and Drexel Heights (population 27,675). These higher-risk communities concentrate near or within the core urban area, and landlords with units in those corridors should build longer vacancy buffers and tighter screening protocols into their underwriting.
The lower end of the spectrum tells a different story. Green Valley, with 22,114 residents, scores just 2.5/10, the lowest in the county by a meaningful margin. Sahuarita scores 2.7/10, and Oro Valley comes in at 2.4/10, both substantially below the county average. Marana (population 56,938) sits at 2.4/10. The core lesson is that eviction risk in Pima County is hyper-local: two properties separated by a few miles can carry materially different risk profiles.
State-level laws that apply here
Every landlord in Pima County operates under the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (A.R.S. § 33-1301 et seq.). The notice schedule is relatively landlord-favorable: nonpayment of rent triggers a 5-day notice under ARS § 33-1368(B), a curable material noncompliance requires a 10-day notice under ARS § 33-1368(A), and terminating a month-to-month tenancy requires 30 days under ARS § 33-1375. An uncontested eviction typically resolves in 21 to 35 days; contested matters run 60 to 120 days. Arizona state law preempts any local attempt at rent control, and no just-cause requirement applies to terminations, which provides landlords with meaningful lease-management flexibility. The Arizona eviction process does carry real out-of-pocket costs: court filing fees range from $210 to $350, sheriff lockout fees add $50 to $150, and attorney fees commonly run $500 to $3,000, depending on contest level. Understanding Arizona eviction costs upfront lets investors model worst-case cash flow before acquiring here. Landlords who want the full picture on rules covering deposits and habitability should also review Arizona security deposit limits and Arizona tenant protections under A.R.S. § 33-1324.
With a poverty rate averaging 14.3% across the county, the risk spread from Green Valley to Flowing Wells is not cosmetic, and the city-level grid above is the most direct tool for pinpointing where within Pima County an investment stands on that spectrum.
Eviction filings in Pima County
In September 2025, 917 eviction filings were recorded in Pima County, 98.9% of the historical average (near average).1
- 917Sep 2025
- 98.9%of historical avg
- 151,661Renter households
- 14.4%Poverty rate
Historical eviction filings in Pima County
From 2004 to 2017, eviction filings in Pima County declined 18%. The peak was 17,194 filings in 2005.2
- 16,0702004
- 17,194Peak (2005)
- 13,1592017
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Pima County compares
Among the peer counties tracked alongside Pima County, the closest comparable is Santa Cruz County at 5.05/10, just 0.05 points below Pima's 2.9/10 average. Coconino County scores 3.98/10, Maricopa County 3.71/10, Pinal County 3.32/10, and Yuma County 3.01/10, all substantially lower.
Pima County ranks 1st of 15 counties in Arizona eviction laws by eviction risk, meaning it carries the highest average risk score in the state. Investors comparing metro Tucson to the Phoenix metro (Maricopa County, 3.3.2/10) should expect meaningfully greater collection and turnover risk in Pima County submarkets.