Skip to content
Map of Pima County, AZ eviction risk by city, county average 5.1 out of 10
County brief·Updated June 24, 2026

Pima County, Arizona Eviction Risk: Low

49 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Tucson (3.2) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
2.9
LOW

Ranked #4 of 15 AZ counties

1.0M residents · 49 cities · 270 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Pima County eviction risk score history

Min1.5 Average2.2 Now2.9
10 5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.6 1982 · score 1.8 1983 · score 1.7 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.7 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.2 1997 · score 2.1 1998 · score 2.1 1999 · score 2.2 2000 · score 2.1 2001 · score 2.1 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.0 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.4 2013 · score 2.4 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.4 2016 · score 2.6 2017 · score 2.6 2018 · score 2.7 2019 · score 2.7 2020 · score 3.1 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.9 2023 · score 2.9 2024 · score 2.9 2025 · score 2.9 2026 · score 2.9

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Pima County averages 2.9/10 across 49 cities, with scores ranging from 2.9 in the lowest-risk city to 5.4 in the highest-risk cities, including Flowing Wells. Ranked 1st of 15 Arizona counties by eviction risk, the highest in the state.

How Pima County ranks in Arizona

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
High
#4 of 15 AZ counties 2.9 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 79th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 15 counties in Arizona for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Elevated
#17 of 51 states (statewide) 100.7 index
Cost of living, 68th percentileLowHigh
Arizona ranks #17 of 51 states on overall cost of living (right at the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Elevated
#16 of 51 states (statewide) 106.8 index
Housing services cost, 70th percentileLowHigh
Arizona ranks #16 of 51 states on housing services (6.8% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Elevated
#6 of 15 AZ counties 29.5% of income
Income spent on rent, 64th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 15 counties in Arizona on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for Arizona

State-specific playbooks
Arizona Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
Arizona Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
Arizona Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
Arizona Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
Arizona Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Pima County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 Tucson Pop 547,073 · 32.8% income · $1,145 rent · Dem 547,073 3.2 32.8% $1,145 Dem
002 Casas Adobes Pop 72,059 · 30.8% income · $1,650 rent · Dem 72,059 2.6 30.8% $1,650 Dem
003 Marana Pop 56,938 · 24.6% income · $1,818 rent · Dem 56,938 2.4 24.6% $1,818 Dem
004 Catalina Foothills Pop 52,593 · 26.9% income · $1,412 rent · Dem 52,593 2.3 26.9% $1,412 Dem
005 Oro Valley Pop 48,162 · 28.3% income · $1,669 rent · Dem 48,162 2.4 28.3% $1,669 Dem
006 Sahuarita Pop 35,862 · 27.1% income · $1,837 rent · Dem 35,862 2.7 27.1% $1,837 Dem
007 Drexel Heights Pop 27,675 · 32.1% income · $1,342 rent · Dem 27,675 2.7 32.1% $1,342 Dem
008 Green Valley Pop 22,114 · 45.2% income · $1,171 rent · Dem 22,114 2.5 45.2% $1,171 Dem
009 Flowing Wells Pop 16,559 · 31.2% income · $1,034 rent · Dem 16,559 3.1 31.2% $1,034 Dem
010 Vail Pop 16,315 · 22.4% income · $2,057 rent · Dem 16,315 2.3 22.4% $2,057 Dem
011 Tanque Verde Pop 15,866 · 31.9% income · $1,347 rent · Dem 15,866 2.6 31.9% $1,347 Dem
012 Valencia West Pop 14,728 · 14.0% income · $1,850 rent · Dem 14,728 2.4 14.0% $1,850 Dem
013 Tucson Estates Pop 12,136 · 28.7% income · $1,248 rent · Dem 12,136 2.4 28.7% $1,248 Dem
014 Tucson Mountains Pop 11,353 · 51.0% income · $1,450 rent · Dem 11,353 2.5 51.0% $1,450 Dem
015 Corona de Tucson Pop 9,566 · 18.8% income · $2,213 rent · Dem 9,566 2.4 18.8% $2,213 Dem
016 Picture Rocks Pop 9,448 · 51.0% income · $960 rent · Dem 9,448 2.9 51.0% $960 Dem
017 Rincon Valley Pop 6,512 · 36.8% income · $1,896 rent · Dem 6,512 2.3 36.8% $1,896 Dem
018 Catalina Pop 6,489 · 22.8% income · $1,326 rent · Dem 6,489 2.3 22.8% $1,326 Dem
019 Avra Valley Pop 6,277 · 22.7% income · $661 rent · Dem 6,277 3.0 22.7% $661 Dem
020 Three Points Pop 5,254 · 17.2% income · $993 rent · Dem 5,254 2.4 17.2% $993 Dem
021 Summit Pop 4,896 · 30.8% income · $655 rent · Dem 4,896 3.2 30.8% $655 Dem
022 South Tucson Pop 4,550 · 33.4% income · $941 rent · Dem 4,550 3.1 33.4% $941 Dem
023 Ajo Pop 3,107 · 27.3% income · $838 rent · Dem 3,107 2.7 27.3% $838 Dem
024 Sells Pop 1,935 · 11.3% income · $383 rent · Dem 1,935 2.8 11.3% $383 Dem
025 Santa Rosa Pop 615 · 9.0% income · $808 rent · Dem 615 2.8 9.0% $808 Dem
026 Pisinemo Pop 311 · 7.1% income · $702 rent · Dem 311 2.9 7.1% $702 Dem
027 Arivaca Pop 268 · 20.9% income · $498 rent · Dem 268 2.4 20.9% $498 Dem
028 San Miguel Pop 237 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 237 3.0 32.3% $1,044 Dem
029 Gu Oidak Pop 192 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 192 3.1 32.3% $1,044 Dem
030 South Komelik Pop 178 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 178 2.4 32.3% $1,044 Dem
031 Ali Molina Pop 171 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 171 2.1 32.3% $1,044 Dem
032 Topawa Pop 166 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 166 2.3 32.3% $1,044 Dem
033 Chiawuli Tak Pop 146 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 146 2.4 32.3% $1,044 Dem
034 Wahak Hotrontk Pop 125 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 125 2.3 32.3% $1,044 Dem
035 Haivana Nakya Pop 96 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 96 2.3 32.3% $1,044 Dem
036 Anegam Pop 92 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 92 2.4 32.3% $1,044 Dem
037 Ventana Pop 92 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 92 2.3 32.3% $1,044 Dem
038 Ali Chukson Pop 77 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 77 2.1 32.3% $1,044 Dem
039 Ko Vaya Pop 53 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 53 2.3 32.3% $1,044 Dem
040 Why Pop 52 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 52 2.4 32.3% $1,044 Dem
041 Comobabi Pop 44 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 44 2.5 32.3% $1,044 Dem
042 Maish Vaya Pop 38 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 38 2.4 32.3% $1,044 Dem
043 Kohatk Pop 37 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 37 2.5 32.3% $1,044 Dem
044 Cowlic Pop 25 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 25 2.5 32.3% $1,044 Dem
045 Ak Chin Pop 22 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 22 2.0 32.3% $1,044 Dem
046 Tat Momoli Pop 18 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 18 2.6 32.3% $1,044 Dem
047 Ali Chuk Pop 18 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 18 2.3 32.3% $1,044 Dem
048 Nolic Pop 12 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 12 2.5 32.3% $1,044 Dem
049 Charco Pop 7 · 32.3% income · $1,044 rent · Dem 7 2.9 32.3% $1,044 Dem

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Pima County carries an average eviction-risk score of 2.9/10, placing it in the Moderate tier, yet that average obscures real variation across the county's 49 cities and census-designated places. More telling is the county's rank: it sits at 1 of 15 Arizona counties, meaning no other county in Arizona scores higher on risk. Landlords operating here face a market where renter share runs at 35.1% of households and average rent sits at $1,324 per month, with rent burden averaging 31.2% of renter income, a combination that historically correlates with elevated lease-compliance stress and collections difficulty.

For investors sizing up Pima County against alternatives in Arizona, the picture is nuanced. The county's 1.0 million residents create genuine demand, and many suburban nodes are meaningfully safer than the county average suggests. However, the intra-county spread from 2 to 3.2 out of 10 means neighborhood selection is as important here as it is almost anywhere in the state, and due diligence on individual zip codes is not optional.

The cities inside Pima County

The highest-risk locations in the county are Flowing Wells, South Tucson, Chiawuli Tak, and Haivana Nakya, each scoring 2.3/10, the ceiling of what any city here reaches. Tucson proper, with a population of 547,073, scores 5.3/10, as do Casas Adobes (population 72,059) and Drexel Heights (population 27,675). These higher-risk communities concentrate near or within the core urban area, and landlords with units in those corridors should build longer vacancy buffers and tighter screening protocols into their underwriting.

The lower end of the spectrum tells a different story. Green Valley, with 22,114 residents, scores just 2.5/10, the lowest in the county by a meaningful margin. Sahuarita scores 2.7/10, and Oro Valley comes in at 2.4/10, both substantially below the county average. Marana (population 56,938) sits at 2.4/10. The core lesson is that eviction risk in Pima County is hyper-local: two properties separated by a few miles can carry materially different risk profiles.

State-level laws that apply here

Every landlord in Pima County operates under the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (A.R.S. § 33-1301 et seq.). The notice schedule is relatively landlord-favorable: nonpayment of rent triggers a 5-day notice under ARS § 33-1368(B), a curable material noncompliance requires a 10-day notice under ARS § 33-1368(A), and terminating a month-to-month tenancy requires 30 days under ARS § 33-1375. An uncontested eviction typically resolves in 21 to 35 days; contested matters run 60 to 120 days. Arizona state law preempts any local attempt at rent control, and no just-cause requirement applies to terminations, which provides landlords with meaningful lease-management flexibility. The Arizona eviction process does carry real out-of-pocket costs: court filing fees range from $210 to $350, sheriff lockout fees add $50 to $150, and attorney fees commonly run $500 to $3,000, depending on contest level. Understanding Arizona eviction costs upfront lets investors model worst-case cash flow before acquiring here. Landlords who want the full picture on rules covering deposits and habitability should also review Arizona security deposit limits and Arizona tenant protections under A.R.S. § 33-1324.

With a poverty rate averaging 14.3% across the county, the risk spread from Green Valley to Flowing Wells is not cosmetic, and the city-level grid above is the most direct tool for pinpointing where within Pima County an investment stands on that spectrum.

Eviction filings in Pima County

In September 2025, 917 eviction filings were recorded in Pima County, 98.9% of the historical average (near average).1

Last 24 months of filings 2023-10 – 2025-09
Monthly eviction filings in Pima County (LSC CCDI)2023-10: 1,311 filings (126.1% of avg)2023-11: 1,186 filings (136.2% of avg)2023-12: 1,089 filings (133.3% of avg)2024-01: 1,308 filings (130.4% of avg)2024-02: 885 filings (117.8% of avg)2024-03: 806 filings (111.6% of avg)2024-04: 808 filings (103.2% of avg)2024-05: 938 filings (106.3% of avg)2024-06: 852 filings (88.9% of avg)2024-07: 1,098 filings (114.3% of avg)2024-08: 995 filings (96.4% of avg)2024-09: 941 filings (101.5% of avg)2024-10: 993 filings (95.5% of avg)2024-11: 877 filings (100.7% of avg)2024-12: 1,014 filings (124.2% of avg)2025-01: 1,042 filings (103.9% of avg)2025-02: 874 filings (116.3% of avg)2025-03: 841 filings (116.4% of avg)2025-04: 825 filings (105.4% of avg)2025-05: 891 filings (100.9% of avg)2025-06: 961 filings (100.3% of avg)2025-07: 873 filings (90.8% of avg)2025-08: 874 filings (84.7% of avg)2025-09: 917 filings (98.9% of avg)

Historical eviction filings in Pima County

From 2004 to 2017, eviction filings in Pima County declined 18%. The peak was 17,194 filings in 2005.2

Annual filings 2004–2017 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in Pima County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2004: 16,070 filings2005: 17,194 filings2006: 16,918 filings2007: 16,686 filings2008: 15,372 filings2009: 13,227 filings2010: 12,965 filings2011: 13,822 filings2012: 13,886 filings2013: 14,390 filings2014: 14,103 filings2015: 11,813 filings2016: 13,264 filings2017: 13,159 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How Pima County compares

Among the peer counties tracked alongside Pima County, the closest comparable is Santa Cruz County at 5.05/10, just 0.05 points below Pima's 2.9/10 average. Coconino County scores 3.98/10, Maricopa County 3.71/10, Pinal County 3.32/10, and Yuma County 3.01/10, all substantially lower.

Pima County ranks 1st of 15 counties in Arizona eviction laws by eviction risk, meaning it carries the highest average risk score in the state. Investors comparing metro Tucson to the Phoenix metro (Maricopa County, 3.3.2/10) should expect meaningfully greater collection and turnover risk in Pima County submarkets.

Peer counties in Arizona

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Pinal County eviction risk
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 405K
Peer county
Mohave County eviction risk
2.7
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 201K
Peer county
Maricopa County eviction risk
2.7
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 4.4M
Peer county
Yuma County eviction risk
3.1
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 191K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Pima County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Top neighborhoods by risk

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Pima County

Q1

What does the 2.9/10 county-average mean?

The 2.9/10 county-average is a population-weighted mean of 49 municipal landlord-risk scores. The internal range is 2 to 3.2.
Q2

What share of Pima County households rent?

About 35.1% of occupied units in Pima County are renter-occupied, per ACS 2023 5-year data.