Tanuri Eviction Risk: Moderate , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019003004 · Pima, AZ · pop 1,579 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 04019003004 covers part of the Tanuri area of Tucson, AZ, and scores 4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,579 residents. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2568, -110.8685 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tanuri scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tanuri compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 68%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 69%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,260Total filings over 12 yrs
- 15.95%Avg annual filing rate
- 25.9%Peak (2004)
- 43Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Tanuri. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.4%Food insecurity
- 7.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.9%Transit barriers
- 8.4%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 30.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tanuri
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,260 filings here across 12 tracked years. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2004 at 25.9% of renter households. In a typical year about 16.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 04019003004
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019003004?
What is the average rent in tract 04019003004?
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019003004?
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019003004?
Is tract 04019003004 considered part of Tanuri?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019003004?
What share of households in tract 04019003004 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 04019003004 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.