Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Tanuri Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019004030 · Pima, AZ · pop 1,819 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 04019004030 covers the Tanuri area of Catalina Foothills in Arizona. Home to 1,819 residents, it scores 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 19% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,853 monthly, set against $154,500 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units702
Renter share6.8%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$154,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
38
th percentile
Low
Within county
7
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
8
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2624, -110.8539 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tanuri scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,853 rent vs county FMR
8.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5
How Tanuri compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 64%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 8Total filings over 7 yrs
- 0.00%Avg annual filing rate
- 0.0%Peak (2005)
- 1Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Tanuri. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.3%Housing insecurity
- 3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.9%Food insecurity
- 3.2%SNAP enrollment
- 3.7%Transit barriers
- 4.6%No health insurance
- 11.7%Frequent mental distress
- 25.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tanuri
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 8.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Pima County average of 5.5 and below the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 4.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at of renter households in 2005.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 04019004030
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004030?
Census tract 04019004030 in the Tanuri neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04019004030?
Median gross rent is $1,853/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004030?
1.8% of residents in tract 04019004030 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,819.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004030?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 64th, minority 38th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 04019004030 considered part of Tanuri?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004030 fall within Tanuri (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004030?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 04019004030 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.00% of renter households, peaking at 0.0% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 04019004030 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 04019004030 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Tract 04019004030 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AZ
Tanuri Hills
2.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
04019004723
2.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tanuri Hills
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
04019004079
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Catalina Foothills
2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
1.9
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
1.8
/ 10 · Very Low
Related