Skip to content
London, Arkansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,217 residents

London, AR Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Pope County · Population 1,217

In 2026
Risk score
2.4
VERY LOW

63th percentile, Arkansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.4 Average3.4 Now2.4
4.4 2.4 1976 · score 4.3 1977 · score 4.3 1978 · score 4.3 1979 · score 4.3 1980 · score 4.4 1981 · score 4.4 1982 · score 4.3 1983 · score 4.2 1984 · score 4.1 1985 · score 4.0 1986 · score 3.9 1987 · score 3.8 1988 · score 3.7 1989 · score 3.3 1990 · score 3.2 1991 · score 3.2 1992 · score 3.7 1993 · score 3.7 1994 · score 3.7 1995 · score 3.7 1996 · score 3.7 1997 · score 3.7 1998 · score 3.8 1999 · score 3.8 2000 · score 3.7 2001 · score 3.7 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.3 2007 · score 3.2 2008 · score 3.2 2009 · score 3.3 2010 · score 3.2 2011 · score 3.1 2012 · score 3.0 2013 · score 2.9 2014 · score 2.8 2015 · score 2.6 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.5 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 3.2 2021 · score 3.4 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.5 2025 · score 2.5 2026 · score 2.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.2 Regional 3.2 State 1.8 Economic 7.0 Supply 4.9 Rent Control 8.6 Eviction 1.5 Tenant 6.1 Housing 8.7 2.4 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +52.2% (2024)
    3.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.2
  3. State political climate
    Arkansas legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    27.8% poverty · 3.1% unemp.
    7.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $827 average · 26.1% renters
    4.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    42.2% of income on rent
    8.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    1.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    26.1% renters
    6.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    8.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across London and the region

Click any city to see its score

How London compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pope County
Low
#5 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 cities in Pope County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arkansas
Elevated
#264 of 621 cities
Rank in state, 58th percentileLowHigh
#264 of 621 cities in Arkansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
London risk score vs. county / state / U.S.London: 2.42.4LondonThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.4
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-1.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $827/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $821–$2,155 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 26.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,217 residents, 26.1% rent. 42% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 27.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.2 and 3.2 (GOP margin +52.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.5, housing court bias 8.7, rent-control risk 8.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7. Supply constraint: 4.9. The numbers behind those: 27.8% poverty, 3.1% unemployment, 42% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

London sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Conway, AR · 30d · ~$1.7k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 Conway Little Rock, AR · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.2 Little Rock Fayetteville, AR · 29d · ~$1.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.3 Fayetteville Fort Smith, AR · 25d · ~$1.6k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.4 Fort Smith Springdale, AR · 28d · ~$1.6k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.2 Springdale Jonesboro, AR · 28d · ~$1.8k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.5 Jonesboro Rogers, AR · 30d · ~$1.7k all-in ($56/day) · score 2 Rogers North Little Rock, AR · 27d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 North Little Rock Bentonville, AR · 30d · ~$1.8k all-in ($61/day) · score 1.9 Bentonville Springfield, MO · 38d · ~$3.8k all-in ($99/day) · score 2.5 Springfield Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle London
London · 26d · ~$1.5k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in London, AR

Landlording in London, Arkansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.4/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

London is a city of 1,217 residents where 26.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 42.2% of income on rent. At an average rent of $827/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How London eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in London closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of London's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 8.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in London runs $821 to $2,155 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $827/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.1/10 in London, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arkansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in London: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arkansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,155 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in London

Trap · 26.1%
26.1% renter share against 1,217 residents produces roughly 318 rental occupants in London. Pope County voted R 50.4% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What happens if my London tenant files for bankruptcy during an eviction?

If your tenant files for bankruptcy, all eviction proceedings stop immediately. This is called an "automatic stay." You cannot proceed without getting permission from the bankruptcy court. You'll need an attorney to file a "motion for relief from stay" to continue the eviction. This complicates things and can add significant time and cost.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant in London, AR for a lease violation other than non-payment?

Yes. If the tenant violates a material term of the lease (e.g., unauthorized pets, property damage, illegal activity), you can typically issue a notice to cure or quit. The lease should specify the cure period, if any. If the violation isn't cured, you can proceed with an unlawful detainer action, similar to a non-payment eviction, but the notice requirements might differ slightly based on the lease and the violation.
Q3

Do I need to store a tenant's abandoned property after an eviction in London?

Arkansas law isn't super prescriptive here. Generally, you should give the tenant a reasonable opportunity to retrieve their belongings. Many landlords send a certified letter to the tenant's last known address, giving them 7-14 days to pick up items. After that period, if the property isn't claimed, you can dispose of it. Document everything, especially photos of the abandoned items.
Q4

Can I raise the rent on my London, AR tenant? Are there limits?

Arkansas has no rent control. You can raise the rent, but you must provide proper notice, typically 30 days for a month-to-month tenancy. If you have a fixed-term lease, you can only raise the rent after the lease term expires, or if the lease explicitly allows for it. Always provide written notice of a rent increase.
Q5

What if my tenant claims my property is uninhabitable?

If a tenant claims the property is uninhabitable and withholds rent, they may try to argue "constructive eviction." In Arkansas, tenants generally cannot unilaterally withhold rent for repairs. They must notify you in writing of issues, and if you don't fix them, their recourse is often to terminate the lease and move out, or sue you for damages. If they withhold rent, you can still proceed with a non-payment eviction, but be prepared to address their claims in court. Always keep good records of maintenance requests and repairs.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.4/10 places London in the 63rd percentile of Arkansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.