Within neighborhood
10
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally
Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell
Tract 06037533701 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,009 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 06037533701 sits in the Walker area of Maywood, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.3/10. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10.
Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units829
Renter share62.8%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate10.2%
Median income$57,169
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
17
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
61
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
85
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bell and the region
Centroid at 33.9888, -118.1821 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 9.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bell
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.2% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,381 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bell
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bell
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bell
7.7
How Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 76%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.5%Housing insecurity
- 11.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 36.0%Food insecurity
- 28.8%SNAP enrollment
- 16.1%Transit barriers
- 26.7%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 39.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Walker
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Food insecurity runs 36.0% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 29.5% against 14.2% nationally. 47% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.7/10. It sits 0.9 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. At $1,381 a month, rents run 9% under what the rest of Maywood commands.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #3,082 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.2/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037533701
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037533701?
Census tract 06037533701 in the Walker neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037533701?
Median gross rent is $1,381/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037533701?
10.2% of residents in tract 06037533701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,009.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037533701?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 76th, minority 99th, housing 83th.
Q5
Is tract 06037533701 considered part of Walker?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037533701 fall within Walker (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037533701 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037533701 compare to Bell overall?
Tract 06037533701 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Bell at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037533701 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bell
Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related