Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell
Tract 06037533401 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,923 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
Tract 06037533401 sits in the Walker area of Maywood, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Bell and the region
Centroid at 33.9937, -118.1936 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 72
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 79%Socioeconomic
- 76%Household composition
- 98%Racial/ethnic minority
- 26%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 97%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.6%Housing insecurity
- 12.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 36.1%Food insecurity
- 30.1%SNAP enrollment
- 16.4%Transit barriers
- 25.8%No health insurance
- 18.7%Frequent mental distress
- 39.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Walker
Severe burden reaches 26%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. 79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Cost burden runs 44% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. Housing insecurity runs 29.6% against 14.2% nationally. SNAP participation runs 30.1% against 15.2% nationally.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.7/10. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037533401
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037533401?
What is the average rent in tract 06037533401?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037533401?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037533401?
Is tract 06037533401 considered part of Walker?
What share of households in tract 06037533401 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037533401 compare to Bell overall?
Was tract 06037533401 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Bell
Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.