Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell
Tract 06037533805 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,816 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
06037533805 is a census tract in the Walker area of Bell, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,816 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Bell and the region
Centroid at 33.9746, -118.1751 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 79%Socioeconomic
- 53%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 70%Grade B
- 30%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.1%Housing insecurity
- 13.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 38.8%Food insecurity
- 34.8%SNAP enrollment
- 17.8%Transit barriers
- 25.0%No health insurance
- 19.0%Frequent mental distress
- 40.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Walker
Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 38.8% against 17.8% nationally. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.
70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Adults with no health insurance runs 25.0% against 11.3% nationally. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.
The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.1/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037533805
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037533805?
What is the average rent in tract 06037533805?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037533805?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037533805?
Is tract 06037533805 considered part of Walker?
What share of households in tract 06037533805 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037533805 compare to Bell overall?
Was tract 06037533805 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Bell
Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.