Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Virgil Village Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037195710 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,860 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

06037195710 is a census tract in the Virgil Village area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. 39% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 61% Stable renters 25% Owners 14%
Tract context
Occupied units1,494
Renter share86.9%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate30.9%
Median income$63,704

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Virgil Village
Moderate
Within parent city
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#290 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#235 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0747, -118.2686 · click any tract to drill in

Why Virgil Village scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
30.9% poverty · this tract
7.7
Supply constraint
$1,729 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Virgil Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Virgil Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 195710Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Virgil Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Virgil Village

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 71% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 87% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $63,704 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. The poverty rate is 31%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

SNAP participation runs 29.6% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Food insecurity runs 30.1% against 17.8% nationally.

Average gross rent is $1,729, 11% below the Los Angeles average.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037195710

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037195710?

Census tract 06037195710 in the Virgil Village neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037195710?

Median gross rent is $1,729/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037195710?

30.9% of residents in tract 06037195710 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,860.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037195710?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 55th, minority 84th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06037195710 considered part of Virgil Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037195710 fall within Virgil Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037195710 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037195710 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037195710 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037195710 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related