Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

Ironsides Eviction Risk: Elevated , Los Angeles

Tract 06037670001 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,698 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 06037670001 sits in the Ironsides area of Lomita, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. It is home to 3,698 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 17% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,256
Renter share40.2%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$106,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 13 tracts In Ironsides
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#2,138 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.8039, -118.3166 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ironsides scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,019 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
6.3

How Ironsides compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ironsides risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 670001Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ironsides. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ironsides

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points. 17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 7.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 57% of renters.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670001?

Census tract 06037670001 in the Ironsides neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037670001?

Median gross rent is $2,019/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670001?

3.3% of residents in tract 06037670001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,698.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 54th, minority 78th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06037670001 considered part of Ironsides?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670001 fall within Ironsides (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037670001 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037670001 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037670001 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037670001 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 23% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related