Larchmont Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037192420 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,564 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
06037192420 is a census tract in the Larchmont area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,564. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0799, -118.3113 · click any tract to drill in
Why Larchmont scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Larchmont compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 84%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 88%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 77%Grade C
- 23%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.9%Housing insecurity
- 7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.1%Food insecurity
- 19.8%SNAP enrollment
- 11.0%Transit barriers
- 11.4%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 29.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Larchmont
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. This is renter territory: 88% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $68,057, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. 59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $1,871, close to the Los Angeles average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037192420
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037192420?
What is the average rent in tract 06037192420?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037192420?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037192420?
Is tract 06037192420 considered part of Larchmont?
What share of households in tract 06037192420 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037192420 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037192420 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.