Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,413 of 84,120 nationally

Newton Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037183702 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,074 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 8.5/10, tract 06037183702 in the Newton Park area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,074 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 25% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,086
Renter share45.9%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$103,026

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Newton Park
Low
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#932 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#1,319 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#2,547 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1048, -118.1837 · click any tract to drill in

Why Newton Park scores 8.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,908 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Newton Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Newton Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.58.5This tracttract 183702Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Newton Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Newton Park

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 25%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. 45% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 94th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely.

Average gross rent is $1,908, close to the Los Angeles average. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $103,026. 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037183702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037183702?

Census tract 06037183702 in the Newton Park neighborhood scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037183702?

Median gross rent is $1,908/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037183702?

4.1% of residents in tract 06037183702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,074.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037183702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 31th, minority 82th, housing 67th.
Q5

Is tract 06037183702 considered part of Newton Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037183702 fall within Newton Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037183702 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037183702 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037183702 scores 8.5/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037183702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related