Raymer Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

The severe-burden share is 35%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Food insecurity runs 45.1% against 17.8% nationally.

Annualized rent equals 45% of average household income of $41,045, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

80% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 33%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Disability prevalence runs 44.0% against 31.5% nationally. At $1,556 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 10/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.