19 census tracts · pop 75,468 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 9.9/10
· range 9.4–9.9
Raymer is a 19-tract neighborhood of Los Angeles, CA, population 75,468. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 9.9/10, in the High tier. 64% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, well clear of the Los Angeles rate of 35.0%.
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Severe burden reaches 36%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. On the high side is eviction-process difficulty at 9.5/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average household income of $56,877 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
This is a renter market: 76% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. SNAP participation is 32.0% of households versus 15.2% nationally. CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 26.3% of adults, against 14.2% nationally.
The poverty rate is 22%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $1,687 a month, rents sit 13% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
That places it #1 of 161 neighborhoods in Los Angeles.
The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
9.9
High
19 tracts · population-weighted
Raymer vs Los AngelesHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority88%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport82%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Raymer
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
24.9%Housing insecurity
11.5%Utility shutoff threat
31.4%Food insecurity
29.0%SNAP enrollment
18.1%No health insurance
36.8%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Raymer
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Raymer?
Raymer scores 9.9/10 (High tier) across 19 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Raymer compare to Los Angeles overall?
Raymer scores 0.1 points higher than Los Angeles overall (9.8/10). Renters spend 64% of income on rent vs 35% citywide. Average rent: $1,687 vs $1,933.
Q3
What is the average rent in Raymer?
Average gross rent in Raymer is $1,687/month (pop-weighted across 19 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Raymer residents are renters?
76% of Raymer households are renter-occupied (vs 64% in Los Angeles). The neighborhood has 75,468 residents.
Q5
Is Raymer a high social-vulnerability area?
Raymer sits in the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in Raymer have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in Raymer is census tract 06037127400 (score 9.9/10). Across the 19 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 9.4 to 9.9, a spread of 0.5 points.
Q7
How safe is Raymer for landlords?
Raymer carries a high-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (9.9/10). Pop-weighted across 19 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Los Angeles as a whole (9.8/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of Raymer?
Raymer has 75,170 residents. Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (66.5%), White (non-Hispanic) (15.2%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (10.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
