Within neighborhood
78
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally
Raymer Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037127604 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,141 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 06037127604 sits in the Raymer area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Population here is 3,141. Cost burden runs 72% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 63%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 12%
Tract context
Occupied units1,524
Renter share87.9%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate24.4%
Median income$47,724
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
64
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
95
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1993, -118.4798 · click any tract to drill in
Why Raymer scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
24.4% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,735 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0
How Raymer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 78%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Raymer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.0%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.1%Food insecurity
- 24.8%SNAP enrollment
- 12.9%Transit barriers
- 14.8%No health insurance
- 17.8%Frequent mental distress
- 35.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Raymer
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. The severe-burden share is 31%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Set annual rent against average income of $47,724 and the ratio lands at 44%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. This is renter territory: 88% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. SNAP participation runs 24.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 26.1% against 17.8% nationally. At $1,735 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037127604
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037127604?
Census tract 06037127604 in the Raymer neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037127604?
Median gross rent is $1,735/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037127604?
24.4% of residents in tract 06037127604 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,141.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037127604?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 66th, minority 78th, housing 70th.
Q5
Is tract 06037127604 considered part of Raymer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037127604 fall within Raymer (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037127604 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037127604 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Tract 06037127604 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Lafayette Park Square
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Nevin
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Harvard Park
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Pacoima
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
06037113234
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
North Hills East
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Toluca Lake
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Larchmont
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related