Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Raymer Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037980008 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 110 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

06037980008 is a census tract in the Raymer area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 110 residents. 72% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 72% Stable renters 28% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units18
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate87.7%

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 19 tracts In Raymer
Very Low
Within parent city
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#197 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#740 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.2106, -118.4907 · click any tract to drill in

Why Raymer scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
87.7% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Raymer compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Raymer risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 980008Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Raymer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Raymer

Cost burden runs roughly three in four here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Housing insecurity runs 40.6% against 14.2% nationally. SNAP participation runs 69.5% against 15.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 88%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

On the high side, economic stress reads 10/10. This is renter territory: 100% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037980008

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037980008?

Census tract 06037980008 in the Raymer neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037980008?

87.7% of residents in tract 06037980008 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 110.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037980008?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 3th, minority 100th, housing 6th.
Q4

Is tract 06037980008 considered part of Raymer?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037980008 fall within Raymer (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037980008 struggle to pay rent?

About 40.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 31.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037980008 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037980008 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related