Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,005 of 84,120 nationally

Raymer Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037127400 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,855 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

How risky is Raymer in Los Angeles for landlords? Census tract 06037127400 scores $1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,643 monthly, set against $63,587 in average yearly household income, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 73% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 33% Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units1,940
Renter share72.7%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate17.2%
Median income$63,587

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 19 tracts In Raymer
Low
Within parent city
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#377 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#534 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#884 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.2103, -118.4782 · click any tract to drill in

Why Raymer scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
17.2% poverty · this tract
4.3
Supply constraint
$1,643 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Raymer compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Raymer risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 127400Los Angeles: 9.99.9Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Raymer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Raymer

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 25.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037127400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037127400?

Census tract 06037127400 in the Raymer neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037127400?

Median gross rent is $1,643/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037127400?

17.2% of residents in tract 06037127400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,855.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037127400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 24th, minority 88th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 06037127400 considered part of Raymer?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037127400 fall within Raymer (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037127400 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037127400 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037127400 scores 8/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related