Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Estates Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037651401 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,524 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

For landlords sizing up Rolling Hills Estates in Rancho Palos Verdes, census tract 06037651401 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.5/10. On the national scale it ranks #34,887 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,249 a month while the average household earns $85,114 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 46% of occupied homes.

Risk score

5.2

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 30% Owners 55%

Tract context

Occupied units1,210

Renter share45.6%

SVI overall0.55

Poverty rate13.5%

Median income$85,114

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7866, -118.3330 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills Estates scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

13.5% poverty · this tract

3.4

Supply constraint

$1,249 rent vs county FMR

1.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

6.6

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

8.8

Housing court bias

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

5.3

How Rolling Hills Estates compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

24%Socioeconomic
50%Household composition
68%Racial/ethnic minority
85%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

10.8%Housing insecurity
5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
14.5%Food insecurity
13.4%SNAP enrollment
7.3%Transit barriers
6.2%No health insurance
14.4%Frequent mental distress
31.9%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills Estates

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Asian and White and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037651401

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037651401?

Census tract 06037651401 in the Rolling Hills Estates neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037651401?

Median gross rent is $1,249/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037651401?

13.5% of residents in tract 06037651401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,524.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037651401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 50th, minority 68th, housing 85th.

Is tract 06037651401 considered part of Rolling Hills Estates?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037651401 fall within Rolling Hills Estates (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037651401 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037651401 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037651401 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.