Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Estates Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037670202 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,568 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 5.2/10, tract 06037670202 in the Rolling Hills Estates area of Rolling Hills Estates, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score

5.2

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 4% Owners 92%

Tract context

Occupied units805

Renter share8.9%

SVI overall0.06

Poverty rate1.5%

Median income$234,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7886, -118.3579 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills Estates scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

1.5% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

$3,501 rent vs county FMR

8.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

6.7

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

2.9

Housing court bias

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

4.6

How Rolling Hills Estates compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

10%Socioeconomic
31%Household composition
59%Racial/ethnic minority
3%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

12%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

4.6%Housing insecurity
2.2%Utility-shutoff threat
4.9%Food insecurity
3.5%SNAP enrollment
3.3%Transit barriers
2.5%No health insurance
10.8%Frequent mental distress
22.1%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills Estates

It sits 3.2 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. SNAP participation runs 3.5% against 15.2% nationally.

Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 4.6% against 14.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 1.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670202

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670202?

Census tract 06037670202 in the Rolling Hills Estates neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037670202?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670202?

1.5% of residents in tract 06037670202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,568.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 31th, minority 59th, housing 3th.

Is tract 06037670202 considered part of Rolling Hills Estates?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670202 fall within Rolling Hills Estates (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037670202 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037670202 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037670202 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037670202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.