Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Estates Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037670418 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,557 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 5.5/10, tract 06037670418 in the Rolling Hills Estates area of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,557. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 6% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,507
Renter share8.6%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$221,205

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Rolling Hills Estates
Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 10 tracts In Rancho Palos Verdes
Very High
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#2,410 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7,883 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7864, -118.3789 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills Estates scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
4.9

How Rolling Hills Estates compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling Hills Estates risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 670418Rancho Palos Verde: 6.96.9Rancho Palos Verdeparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills Estates

It sits 2.9 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 5.5% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #23,808 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.9/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670418

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670418?

Census tract 06037670418 in the Rolling Hills Estates neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037670418?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670418?

3.6% of residents in tract 06037670418 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,557.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670418?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 44th, minority 65th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 06037670418 considered part of Rolling Hills Estates?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670418 fall within Rolling Hills Estates (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037670418 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037670418 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037670418 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037670418 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related