Rolling Hills Estates Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes
Tract 06037670418 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,557 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 5.5/10, tract 06037670418 in the Rolling Hills Estates area of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,557. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region
Centroid at 33.7864, -118.3789 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills Estates scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rolling Hills Estates compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 20%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rolling Hills Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.5%Housing insecurity
- 2.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.0%Food insecurity
- 4.4%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 2.8%No health insurance
- 11.2%Frequent mental distress
- 22.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills Estates
It sits 2.9 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 5.5% against 14.2% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #23,808 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.9/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037670418
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670418?
What is the average rent in tract 06037670418?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670418?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670418?
Is tract 06037670418 considered part of Rolling Hills Estates?
What share of households in tract 06037670418 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037670418 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?
Was tract 06037670418 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes
Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.