Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Saint James Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037224420 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,449 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06037224420 covers part of the Saint James Park area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,449 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 62% Stable renters 33% Owners 5%
Tract context
Occupied units894
Renter share95.0%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate35.9%
Median income$25,725

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 18 tracts In Saint James Park
Elevated
Within parent city
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#519 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#429 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0317, -118.2769 · click any tract to drill in

Why Saint James Park scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
35.9% poverty · this tract
9.0
Supply constraint
$878 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Saint James Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Saint James Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 224420Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Saint James Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Saint James Park

At $878 a month, rents run 55% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Food insecurity runs 50.4% against 17.8% nationally.

This is renter territory: 95% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $25,725 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 36%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Disability prevalence runs 48.9% against 31.5% nationally. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 65% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037224420

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037224420?

Census tract 06037224420 in the Saint James Park neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037224420?

Median gross rent is $878/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037224420?

35.9% of residents in tract 06037224420 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,449.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037224420?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 77th, minority 93th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 06037224420 considered part of Saint James Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037224420 fall within Saint James Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037224420 struggle to pay rent?

About 36.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037224420 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037224420 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037224420 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 43% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related