Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Saint James Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037231220 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,353 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 06037231220 covers part of the Saint James Park area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,353 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 58% Stable renters 35% Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units1,367
Renter share92.8%
SVI overall1.00
Poverty rate26.0%
Median income$35,319

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 18 tracts In Saint James Park
Very Low
Within parent city
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#515 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#461 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0146, -118.2894 · click any tract to drill in

Why Saint James Park scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.0% poverty · this tract
6.5
Supply constraint
$1,185 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Saint James Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Saint James Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 231220Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 100

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Saint James Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Saint James Park

This is renter territory: 93% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. At $1,185 a month, rents run 39% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

Food insecurity runs 38.0% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $35,319 and the ratio lands at 40%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 10/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037231220

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037231220?

Census tract 06037231220 in the Saint James Park neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037231220?

Median gross rent is $1,185/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037231220?

26.0% of residents in tract 06037231220 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,353.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037231220?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 100th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 98th, minority 97th, housing 95th.
Q5

Is tract 06037231220 considered part of Saint James Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037231220 fall within Saint James Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037231220 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037231220 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037231220 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037231220 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related