Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally

Sunkist Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Los Angeles

Tract 06037702700 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,460 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 06037702700 covers part of the Sunkist Park area of Culver City, CA, and scores 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,460 residents. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.7 points.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 9% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,285
Renter share20.8%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate1.9%
Median income$171,875

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Sunkist Park
Very Low
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#2,306 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#7,527 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0059, -118.4010 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sunkist Park scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,317 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
5.7

How Sunkist Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sunkist Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 702700Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sunkist Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sunkist Park

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally.

At $2,317 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Culver City commands. On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.2/10.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #21,564 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $171,875, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037702700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037702700?

Census tract 06037702700 in the Sunkist Park neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037702700?

Median gross rent is $2,317/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037702700?

1.9% of residents in tract 06037702700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,460.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037702700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 44th, minority 61th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 06037702700 considered part of Sunkist Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037702700 fall within Sunkist Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037702700 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037702700 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037702700 scores 5.7/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037702700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related