Sunkist Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Los Angeles
Tract 06037702600 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 6,688 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 06037702600 sits in the Sunkist Park area of Culver City, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. It sits 2.7 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9959, -118.3962 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sunkist Park scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sunkist Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 61%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sunkist Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.5%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 3.9%No health insurance
- 12.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Sunkist Park
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10.
Food insecurity runs 7.5% against 17.8% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.2/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 74th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
52% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037702600
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037702600?
What is the average rent in tract 06037702600?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037702600?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037702600?
Is tract 06037702600 considered part of Sunkist Park?
What share of households in tract 06037702600 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037702600 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037702600 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.