Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Tehrangeles Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037265601 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,019 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 9.3/10, tract 06037265601 in the Tehrangeles area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,019. 39% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 24% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,400
Renter share51.5%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$101,389

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 tracts In Tehrangeles
Moderate
Within parent city
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#735 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#943 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0559, -118.4327 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tehrangeles scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$2,569 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Tehrangeles compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tehrangeles risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 265601Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 49

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tehrangeles. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tehrangeles

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Average gross rent is $2,569, 33% above the Los Angeles average. It sits 0.9 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Food insecurity runs 10.0% against 17.8% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.3% against 11.3% nationally.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 5.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 54% of renters. Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $101,389.

52% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037265601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037265601?

Census tract 06037265601 in the Tehrangeles neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037265601?

Median gross rent is $2,569/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037265601?

11.5% of residents in tract 06037265601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,019.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037265601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 53th, minority 36th, housing 72th.
Q5

Is tract 06037265601 considered part of Tehrangeles?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037265601 fall within Tehrangeles (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037265601 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037265601 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037265601 scores 9.3/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037265601 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related