Rose Hill Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037199120 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,031 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06037199120 covers part of the Rose Hill area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 40%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0701, -118.1997 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rose Hill scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rose Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 97%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 34%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 27.1%Housing insecurity
- 13.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 37.6%Food insecurity
- 35.4%SNAP enrollment
- 17.4%Transit barriers
- 21.5%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 42.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. SNAP participation runs 35.4% against 15.2% nationally.
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Food insecurity runs 37.6% against 17.8% nationally. Annualized rent equals 39% of average household income of $41,850, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
81% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 34%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $1,350 a month, rents run 30% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Cost burden runs 60% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037199120
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037199120?
What is the average rent in tract 06037199120?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037199120?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037199120?
Is tract 06037199120 considered part of Rose Hill?
What share of households in tract 06037199120 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037199120 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037199120 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.