Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037199120 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,031 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 06037199120 covers part of the Rose Hill area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 40%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 32% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units1,103
Renter share81.0%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate33.6%
Median income$41,850

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 10 tracts In Rose Hill
High
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#508 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#245 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0701, -118.1997 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
33.6% poverty · this tract
8.4
Supply constraint
$1,350 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Rose Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 199120Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. SNAP participation runs 35.4% against 15.2% nationally.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Food insecurity runs 37.6% against 17.8% nationally. Annualized rent equals 39% of average household income of $41,850, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

81% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 34%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $1,350 a month, rents run 30% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Cost burden runs 60% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037199120

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037199120?

Census tract 06037199120 in the Rose Hill neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037199120?

Median gross rent is $1,350/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037199120?

33.6% of residents in tract 06037199120 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,031.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037199120?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 80th, minority 95th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06037199120 considered part of Rose Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037199120 fall within Rose Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037199120 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037199120 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037199120 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037199120 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 34% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related