Within neighborhood
83
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,210 of 84,120 nationally
The Flats Eviction Risk: High , Beverly Hills
Tract 06037700801 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,858 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
06037700801 is a census tract in the The Flats area of Beverly Hills, CA. It scores 9.8/10 for landlords. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
9.8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units2,329
Renter share63.3%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate18.1%
Median income$81,438
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
69
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
88
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Beverly Hills and the region
Centroid at 34.0717, -118.3968 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Flats scores 9.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Beverly Hills
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
18.1% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$2,583 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beverly Hills
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beverly Hills
6.3
How The Flats compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 64%Socioeconomic
- 88%Household composition
- 37%Racial/ethnic minority
- 67%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 31%Grade B
- 16%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within The Flats. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.6%Food insecurity
- 8.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 3.9%No health insurance
- 14.2%Frequent mental distress
- 28.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in The Flats
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 38% of average household income of $81,438, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 46% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.7/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Adults with no health insurance runs 3.9% against 11.3% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
At $2,583 a month, rents run 9% under what the rest of Beverly Hills commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 97% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.6/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037700801
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037700801?
Census tract 06037700801 in the The Flats neighborhood scores 9.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037700801?
Median gross rent is $2,583/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037700801?
18.1% of residents in tract 06037700801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,858.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037700801?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 88th, minority 37th, housing 67th.
Q5
Is tract 06037700801 considered part of The Flats?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037700801 fall within The Flats (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037700801 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037700801 compare to Beverly Hills overall?
Tract 06037700801 scores 9.8/10, higher than the parent city of Beverly Hills at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beverly Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037700801 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Beverly Hills
Top eight tracts in Beverly Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related