Within parent city
65
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally
Los Angeles Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06037113234 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,653
06037113234 is a census tract in Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,665
Renter share51.5%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate17.6%
Median income$72,769
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
99
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
National
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.2258, -118.5940 · click any tract to drill in
Why Los Angeles scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
17.6% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,837 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0
How Los Angeles compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 93%Socioeconomic
- 86%Household composition
- 84%Racial/ethnic minority
- 100%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 19.7%Housing insecurity
- 8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 25.3%Food insecurity
- 21.8%SNAP enrollment
- 11.9%Transit barriers
- 15.0%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 35.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Los Angeles
Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. The severe-burden share is 27%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Cost burden runs 44% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Food insecurity runs 25.3% against 17.8% nationally. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $1,837, close to the Los Angeles average. Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $72,769. 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037113234
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037113234?
Census tract 06037113234 in Los Angeles scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037113234?
Median gross rent is $1,837/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037113234?
17.6% of residents in tract 06037113234 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,653.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037113234?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 86th, minority 84th, housing 100th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06037113234 struggle to pay rent?
About 19.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06037113234 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Tract 06037113234 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Country Club Park
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Nevin
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Village Green
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Watts
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Reynier Village
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Westchester
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Pacoima
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Raymer
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related