Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Flower District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037206303 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,757 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037206303 in the Flower District area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,757. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 37% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 62% Owners 2%
Tract context
Occupied units550
Renter share98.7%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate74.3%
Median income$11,542

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Flower District
Low
Within parent city
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#294 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#287 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0401, -118.2416 · click any tract to drill in

Why Flower District scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
74.3% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$342 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Flower District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Flower District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 206303Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Flower District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Flower District

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Average gross rent is $342, 82% below the Los Angeles average.

Food insecurity runs 60.3% against 17.8% nationally. The poverty rate is 74%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Running hot, economic stress reads 10/10.

99% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Set annual rent against average income of $11,542 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Adults with no health insurance runs 20.8% against 11.3% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037206303

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037206303?

Census tract 06037206303 in the Flower District neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037206303?

Median gross rent is $342/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037206303?

74.3% of residents in tract 06037206303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,757.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037206303?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 24th, minority 85th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06037206303 considered part of Flower District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037206303 fall within Flower District (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037206303 struggle to pay rent?

About 43.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 32.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037206303 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037206303 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related