Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16 of 84,120 nationally

Flower District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037206303 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,757 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06037206303 (the Flower District neighborhood of Los Angeles, California) comes in at 7.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 98% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 37% of renter households, a high level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $342 monthly, set against $11,542 in average yearly household income, roughly 36% of income at the averages. About 99% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
9.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 62% Owners 2%
Tract context
Occupied units550
Renter share98.7%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate74.3%
Median income$11,542

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Flower District
Very High
Within parent city
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0401, -118.2416 · click any tract to drill in

Why Flower District scores 9.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
74.3% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$342 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Flower District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Flower District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.59.5This tracttract 206303Los Angeles: 9.99.9Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Flower District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Flower District

The heaviest input here is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 43.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 32.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037206303

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037206303?

Census tract 06037206303 in the Flower District neighborhood scores 9.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037206303?

Median gross rent is $342/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037206303?

74.3% of residents in tract 06037206303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,757.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037206303?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 24th, minority 85th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06037206303 considered part of Flower District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037206303 fall within Flower District (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037206303 struggle to pay rent?

About 43.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 32.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037206303 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037206303 scores 9.5/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related