Neighborhood · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally

Belmont Shore Eviction Risk: Elevated , Long Beach

Tract 06037577200 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,770 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06037577200 (Belmont Shore in Long Beach, California) comes in at $1/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 34% of renter households, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,993 monthly, set against $108,668 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 76% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

6.3

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 50% Owners 24%

Tract context

Occupied units3,255

Renter share76.0%

SVI overall0.35

Poverty rate7.6%

Median income$108,668

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7526, -118.1587 · click any tract to drill in

Why Belmont Shore scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Long Beach

8.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

7.6% poverty · this tract

1.9

Supply constraint

$1,993 rent vs county FMR

2.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Long Beach

9.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

8.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Long Beach

8.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Long Beach

8.5

How Belmont Shore compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

39%Socioeconomic
3%Household composition
57%Racial/ethnic minority
74%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
75%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Belmont Shore. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

9.8%Housing insecurity
4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
9.5%Food insecurity
8.1%SNAP enrollment
5.8%Transit barriers
5.3%No health insurance
15.2%Frequent mental distress
22.5%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Belmont Shore

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037577200

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037577200?

Census tract 06037577200 in the Belmont Shore neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037577200?

Median gross rent is $1,993/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037577200?

7.6% of residents in tract 06037577200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,770.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037577200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 3th, minority 57th, housing 74th.

Is tract 06037577200 considered part of Belmont Shore?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037577200 fall within Belmont Shore (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037577200 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037577200 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037577200 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of Long Beach at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037577200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.