Malibu Eviction Risk: Elevated

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.9/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

It sits 2.1 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.3/10.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.9/10. Food insecurity runs 6.8% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 6.0% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.