Neighborhood · Ranked #16,571 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Estates Eviction Risk: Elevated , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037651402 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,842 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 06037651402 sits in the Rolling Hills Estates area of Torrance eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.3/10. The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score

6.3

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 22% Owners 52%

Tract context

Occupied units2,028

Renter share48.6%

SVI overall0.54

Poverty rate4.5%

Median income$102,056

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7960, -118.3447 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills Estates scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

4.5% poverty · this tract

1.1

Supply constraint

$2,262 rent vs county FMR

3.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

6.6

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

8.8

Housing court bias

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

5.3

How Rolling Hills Estates compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

23%Socioeconomic
89%Household composition
80%Racial/ethnic minority
50%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

7.3%Housing insecurity
3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
8.4%Food insecurity
6.3%SNAP enrollment
4.8%Transit barriers
3.8%No health insurance
12.3%Frequent mental distress
22.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills Estates

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.1/10. It sits 2.1 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.3% against 15.2% nationally.

On the national scale it lands near the 80th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 54% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037651402

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037651402?

Census tract 06037651402 in the Rolling Hills Estates neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037651402?

Median gross rent is $2,262/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037651402?

4.5% of residents in tract 06037651402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,842.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037651402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 89th, minority 80th, housing 50th.

Is tract 06037651402 considered part of Rolling Hills Estates?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037651402 fall within Rolling Hills Estates (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037651402 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037651402 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037651402 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.