Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037670405 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,715 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Here is how census tract 06037670405, in the Rolling Hills neighborhood of Rancho Palos Verdes, looks to a landlord: a 5.9/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 2,715. That is riskier than about 73% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,059 a month while the average household earns $147,143 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 24% of occupied homes.

Risk score

2.9

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 12% Owners 76%

Tract context

Occupied units1,112

Renter share24.0%

SVI overall0.56

Poverty rate6.4%

Median income$147,143

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7671, -118.3749 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

6.4% poverty · this tract

1.6

Supply constraint

$3,059 rent vs county FMR

6.7

Rent control risk

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

4.6

Housing court bias

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

4.9

How Rolling Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

20%Socioeconomic
91%Household composition
64%Racial/ethnic minority
65%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

5.5%Housing insecurity
2.5%Utility-shutoff threat
7.5%Food insecurity
5.6%SNAP enrollment
4.2%Transit barriers
3.3%No health insurance
10.3%Frequent mental distress
28.8%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670405

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670405?

Census tract 06037670405 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037670405?

Median gross rent is $3,059/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670405?

6.4% of residents in tract 06037670405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,715.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670405?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 91th, minority 64th, housing 65th.

Is tract 06037670405 considered part of Rolling Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670405 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037670405 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037670405 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037670405 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.