Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037670702 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,722 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06037670702 (the Rolling Hills neighborhood of Rancho Palos Verdes, California) comes in at 5.9/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 73% of US census tracts.

About 59% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $203,039 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 7% of occupied homes.

Risk score

2.5

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 3% Owners 93%

Tract context

Occupied units2,022

Renter share7.1%

SVI overall0.09

Poverty rate2.8%

Median income$203,039

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7548, -118.3294 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

2.8% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

$3,501 rent vs county FMR

8.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

7.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

4.6

Housing court bias

Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes

4.9

How Rolling Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

13%Socioeconomic
17%Household composition
47%Racial/ethnic minority
10%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

17%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

6.0%Housing insecurity
2.8%Utility-shutoff threat
6.5%Food insecurity
4.9%SNAP enrollment
4.0%Transit barriers
3.3%No health insurance
12.0%Frequent mental distress
24.8%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 8.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670702

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670702?

Census tract 06037670702 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037670702?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670702?

2.8% of residents in tract 06037670702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,722.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 17th, minority 47th, housing 10th.

Is tract 06037670702 considered part of Rolling Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670702 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037670702 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037670702 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037670702 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037670702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.