Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Knoll Eviction Risk: Elevated , San Marino

Tract 06037480500 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,417 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 6.4/10, tract 06037480500 in the Oak Knoll area of South Pasadena, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,417 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 19% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units2,146
Renter share36.7%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$119,167

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Oak Knoll
Elevated
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In San Marino
Very Low
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#2,107 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Marino and the region

Centroid at 34.1083, -118.1449 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Knoll scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Marino
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,165 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Marino
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Marino
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Marino
3.8

How Oak Knoll compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Knoll risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 480500San Marino: 6.56.5San Marinoparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oak Knoll. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Knoll

Severe burden reaches 25%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. It sits 2.0 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 48% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.5% against 11.3% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 3.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037480500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037480500?

Census tract 06037480500 in the Oak Knoll neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037480500?

Median gross rent is $2,165/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037480500?

2.5% of residents in tract 06037480500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,417.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037480500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 15th, minority 64th, housing 32th.
Q5

Is tract 06037480500 considered part of Oak Knoll?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037480500 fall within Oak Knoll (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037480500 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037480500 compare to San Marino overall?

Tract 06037480500 scores 6.4/10, right in line with the parent city of San Marino at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Marino; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037480500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Marino

Top eight tracts in San Marino ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related