Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Larkspur Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06041120001 · Marin, CA · pop 1,615

How risky is Larkspur for landlords? Census tract 06041120001 scores 5.7/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 66% of US census tracts.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 43% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,013 monthly, set against $155,625 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 69% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 32% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units727
Renter share68.9%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$155,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Larkspur
Very Low
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 62 tracts In Marin
Moderate
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#7,017 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#41,065 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Larkspur and the region

Centroid at 37.9480, -122.5465 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larkspur scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Larkspur
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,013 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Larkspur
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Larkspur
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Larkspur
6.3

How Larkspur compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larkspur risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 120001Larkspur: 8.08.0Larkspurparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larkspur

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Larkspur, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Marin County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06041120001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06041120001?

Census tract 06041120001 in Larkspur scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06041120001?

Median gross rent is $3,013/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06041120001?

2.4% of residents in tract 06041120001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,615.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06041120001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 62th, minority 34th, housing 25th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06041120001 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06041120001 compare to Larkspur overall?

Tract 06041120001 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Larkspur at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Larkspur; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Larkspur

Top eight tracts in Larkspur ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related