Skip to content
Del Monte Forest, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,613 residents

Del Monte Forest, CA Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Monterey County · Population 3,613

In 2026
Risk score
4.6
MODERATE

16th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average3.2 Now4.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.5 1977 · score 1.5 1978 · score 1.5 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.4 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.5 1983 · score 1.4 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.4 1987 · score 1.4 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 1.9 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.7 1997 · score 2.7 1998 · score 2.8 1999 · score 2.8 2000 · score 2.7 2001 · score 2.7 2002 · score 2.8 2003 · score 2.8 2004 · score 3.1 2005 · score 3.1 2006 · score 3.2 2007 · score 3.2 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.0 2010 · score 4.1 2011 · score 4.1 2012 · score 4.1 2013 · score 4.1 2014 · score 4.3 2015 · score 4.3 2016 · score 4.6 2017 · score 4.8 2018 · score 5.0 2019 · score 5.2 2020 · score 6.0 2021 · score 6.0 2022 · score 6.0 2023 · score 6.0 2024 · score 5.8 2025 · score 4.6 2026 · score 4.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.2 Regional 8.2 State 6.8 Economic 4.4 Supply 6.8 Rent Control 4.3 Eviction 6.0 Tenant 3.7 Housing 3.8 4.6 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +29.9% (2024)
    8.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.2
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    5.5% poverty · 3.7% unemp.
    4.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $3,501 average · 12.8% renters
    6.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.5% of income on rent
    4.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    251 days filing → judgment
    6.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.8% renters
    3.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Del Monte Forest and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Del Monte Forest compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Monterey County
Very Low
#21 of 25 cities
Rank in county — 17th percentileBottomTop
#21 of 25 cities in Monterey County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Very Low
#1354 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state — 15th percentileBottomTop
#1354 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Del Monte Forest risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Del Monte Forest: 4.64.6Del Monte ForestThis cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg in countyState: 6.66.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.6
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 251d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $3,501/mo. A contested eviction takes 251 days and costs $13,681–$34,393 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,613 residents, 12.8% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8.2 and 8.2 (Dem margin +29.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.0, housing court bias 3.8, rent-control risk 4.3. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.4. Supply constraint: 6.8. The numbers behind those: 5.5% poverty, 3.7% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Del Monte Forest sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 8.4 San Jose Salinas, CA · 267d · ~$24.7k all-in ($93/day) · score 5.8 Salinas Santa Cruz, CA · 288d · ~$23.9k all-in ($83/day) · score 5.9 Santa Cruz Gilroy, CA · 288d · ~$27.0k all-in ($94/day) · score 5.4 Gilroy Watsonville, CA · 255d · ~$26.3k all-in ($103/day) · score 6.0 Watsonville Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 9.1 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 7.7 San Diego San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.2 San Francisco Fresno, CA · 279d · ~$24.4k all-in ($88/day) · score 6.9 Fresno Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 8.0 Sacramento Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Del Monte Forest
Del Monte Forest · 251d · ~$24.0k all-in ($96/day) · score 4.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Del Monte Forest, CA

Landlording in Del Monte Forest, California, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.6/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Del Monte Forest is a city of 3,613 residents where 12.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $3,501/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Del Monte Forest eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.0/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Del Monte Forest closes 251 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Del Monte Forest's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Del Monte Forest runs $13,681 to $34,393 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 251 days of typical timeline and $3,501/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.7/10 in Del Monte Forest, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Del Monte Forest: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $34,393 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Del Monte Forest

Trap · 4.3/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Del Monte Forest's 4.6/10 is below the California state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 4.3/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Del Monte Forest?

No. California has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. After a tenant has lived in your property for 12 months (or more, depending on circumstances), you need a legally recognized reason to evict them, such as non-payment of rent, breach of lease, or an owner move-in.
Q2

How long do I have to return a security deposit in California?

You have 21 calendar days from the date the tenant moves out to return the security deposit or provide an itemized statement of deductions. Missing this deadline can result in penalties, including the tenant suing for double the deposit amount.
Q3

Is "cash for keys" legal in California?

Yes, "cash for keys" is a legal and often recommended strategy in California. It's a voluntary agreement where you offer a tenant money to move out quickly and amicably, avoiding a lengthy and expensive eviction process. Always get the agreement in writing.
Q4

Do I need a lawyer to evict a tenant in Del Monte Forest?

While not legally required, it is highly recommended to hire an attorney for an eviction in California. The process is complex, tenant-friendly, and even minor errors can lead to significant delays and additional costs. Given the 251-day average timeline and high costs, professional legal help is a wise investment.
Q5

Can I refuse to rent to someone who uses a Section 8 voucher?

No. California has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot discriminate against prospective tenants solely because they receive lawful income, including housing assistance programs like Section 8. You must treat their income the same as any other legal income source.
Q6

What is the maximum late fee I can charge in California?

California law states that late fees must be a "reasonable estimate" of the costs incurred by the landlord due to the late payment. There isn't a specific percentage cap, but excessive fees are illegal. Typically, a fee of 5-10% of the monthly rent is considered reasonable, but it's best to consult an attorney.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.6/10 places Del Monte Forest in the 16th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.